This is Part 4 of a series examining how NHL teams acquired their top players and what we can learn from their team-building efforts.
For the purposes of this series, we’ll look at the top three forwards, the top two defensemen, and the starting goalie on each squad for 2023-24. That can get a bit subjective, but when in doubt, 2022-23 playing time and point totals (or salary) all work as handy tiebreakers.
Previous articles: Atlantic, Metropolitan, Central
The Pacific Division might have the most variety of the NHL’s four divisions.
This group of eight teams includes the defending champions, the best player on the planet and the two teams with the worst odds to win the Stanley Cup.
In the middle, you’ll find a Los Angeles squad that keeps reloading, a couple of Canadian squads with aspirations greater than their 2022-23 results, and the NHL’s newest franchise.
Here’s a rundown of how the teams in the Pacific put together their cores:
Core players
What we can learn: It’s unfair to compare other teams to the Golden Knights because they’re built on the foundation of an expansion draft. Not only did that process yield important players that helped them win a title, it also gave them a clean cap sheet to build off of.
That allowed them to hunt expensive stars on the trade market and in free agency.
Eichel, Stone, and Pietrangelo were essential in putting the team over the top, and Vegas should be commended for its aggressiveness. At the same time, it’s worth acknowledging that not all of their moves were available to other franchises.
Core players
What we can learn: When you are constantly picking at the top of the draft, you’re going to unearth some stars, and it seems unfair to give the Oilers too much credit for scooping up McDavid when he fell into their lap. With high-pick misses like Nail Yakupov and Jesse Puljujärvi on the resume it’s not even fair to say Edmonton has maximized its opportunities.
Even so, Draisaitl has exceeded expectations, Bouchard just had a breakout playoffs, and Skinner might just be a find — so there are some drafting success stories. Theoretically, this homegrown core should allow for plenty of free-agent activity, and the Oilers have certainly dabbled in recent years but Zach Hyman is the only big win there.
Core players
-
F Anže Kopitar (Drafted 11th overall in 2005)
-
F Pierre-Luc Dubois (Trade acquisition 2023, extended in 2023)
-
F Kevin Fiala (Trade acquisition 2022, extended in 2022)
-
D Drew Doughty (Drafted 2nd overall in 2008)
-
D Michael Anderson (Drafted 103rd overall in 2017)
-
G Pheonix Copley (Free-agent signing 2022 and again in 2023)
What we can learn: The Kings have historically drafted well and they are still building around two players they selected back in the aughts.
More recently Los Angeles has been aggressive at finding talent outside the organization, though. Behind Kopitar, four of the team’s top five forwards (Dubois, Fiala, Phillip Danault and Viktor Arvidsson) are imports — with Adrian Kempe as the sole exception.
Sometimes a hometown core doesn’t organically come to you and you have to throw one together. The Kings have done a good job of managing that, though the team’s inability to find a goaltender is a sore spot, and the narrative around the team’s drafting could shift slightly if 2020 second-overall pick Quinton Byfield doesn’t find his way.
Core players
What we can learn: Like the Golden Knights, the Kraken’s recent expansion draft makes them difficult to compare other teams to. One thing the team has done that others could mimic is aggressively extending its players when they break out.
That tends to be a wise course of action, and the deals for Dunn and McCann in particular look like they’ll be team-friendly in the years to come — particularly if the cap rises steadily.
Core players
What we can learn: Calgary is a bit of an odd case because the team was forced to reinvent itself against its will when Johnny Gaudreau and Matthew Tkachuk didn’t want to stick around.
Swapping the pair for Huberdeau and Kadri did not work as intended in 2022-23, but if the team’s production can come in line with its underlying numbers the Flames might bounce back in the new era.
While there’s plenty still to be determined for this squad, they deserve some credit for finding players like Mangiapane and Andersson later on in the draft.
Core players
What we can learn: Vancouver found a number of foundation players in the mid to late 2010s and has since built around that group with imports. On paper that sounds fundamentally sound, but this team has yet to see much success with this strategy.
Pettersson and Hughes in particular are strong foundational pieces, but some of the team’s biggest moves around them — such as trading for Oliver Ekman-Larsson and Conor Garland — haven’t turned out as expected.
Vancouver’s foundation also suffers from a run of notable first-round busts like Nicklas Jensen (29th overall 2011), Brendan Gaunce (26th overall 2012), Hunter Shinkaruk (24th overall 2013), Jake Virtanen (6th overall 2014), and Olli Juolevi (5th overall 2015).
Core players
-
F Logan Couture (Drafted 9th overall in 2007)
-
F Tomáš Hertl (Drafted 17th overall in 2012)
-
F Alexander Barbanov (Trade acquisition in 2021, extended in 2022)
-
D Mario Ferraro (Drafted 49th overall in 2017)
-
D Matt Benning (Free-agent signing 2022)
-
G Kaapo Kähkonen (Trade acquisition in 2022, extended in 2022)
What we can learn: This team’s current core is a combination of leftovers from a more successful time and stopgaps as the young players that will drive San Jose’s next competitive era wait in the wings.
The Sharks’ decision to try and extend their window by adding Erik Karlsson was probably inadvisable from the start despite a solid 2018-19 playoff run. Now he’s gone and the team’s best asset is its cap flexibility, plus the high draft picks that will be coming its way for years.
Core players
-
F Trevor Zegreas (Drafted 9th overall in 2019)
-
F Troy Terry (Drafted 148th overall in 2015)
-
F Alex Killorn (Free-agent signing 2023)
-
D Cam Fowler (Drafted 12th overall in 2010)
-
D Jamie Drysdale (Drafted 6th overall in 2020)
-
G John Gibson (Drafted 39th overall in 2011)
What we can learn: The Ducks are a long way from contention, and it would be hard to see Anaheim as a model for anyone to follow as they are on a collision course with an eighth-straight season out of the playoffs.
They do deserve some credit for unearthing a hidden gem in Terry, but he’s more of a unicorn than evidence that Anaheim knows what it’s doing at the draft.
The Ducks have more present value on their roster than the Sharks, but they’re still not at a point where adding Killorn made much sense for the franchise. The Tampa Bay Lightning mainstay — along with veteran defenceman Radko Gudas — are likely to languish on a non-competitive team for some time as Anaheim builds its way back to respectability.
