Hamilton situation may not play out until closer to the start of free agency
Sportsnet: Chris Johnston on Headlines said that Carolina Hurricanes pending free agent defenseman Dougie Hamilton is getting plenty of interest.
âIt sounds like thereâs been a lot of conversations between Hamiltonâs agent, J.P. Barry, and teams around the league. You get the feeling here that this isnât necessarily gonna resolve itself quickly.
âHe has the ability to agree to terms with a team that could work out a sign and trade with Carolina. The business of the league is slowly getting up and going again. I donât think weâll see something here for a few weeks, much closer to that free agency date on July 28.â
Sportsnet: Elliotte Friedman said that the Arizona Coyotes will once again try to trade defenseman Oliver Ekman-Larsson, but they will try to handle it differently this offseason.
âThe two sides are going to try again, but this time around theyâre going to approach it differently. What Ekman-Larsson has told the Coyotes and what the Coyotes have agreed to do is theyâre going to go out there, check the market and theyâre going to bring a deal to him and then he can decide if heâs comfortable with that team.â
Craig Morgan of AZ Coyotes Insider: The Coyotes will be exploring the trade market for defenseman Oliver Ekman-Larsson again this offseason according to sources. OEL appears to be more open this offseason.
Ekman-Larsson carries a $8.5 million salary cap hit for six
more seasons and has $10.5 million salary for the next three years. His play has declined over the past couple of seasons.
Ownership told GM Bill Armstrong last offseason that theyâd like to see Ekman-Larsson traded. OEL has a no-movement clause and only listed the Vancouver Canucks and Boston Bruins as teams heâd accept a trade to last October.
The Coyotes will talk to teams, then present them to Ekman-Larsson to see if it would work for him. He hasnât given the Coyotes a list of teams.
Would the Edmonton Oilers be interested in Dave Tippett-OEL reunion?
The Coyotes could take salary back but with the less term. Retaining salary could another option.
All parties agree that change is needed.
Â
Â